Saline nasal irrigation may be beneficial for sufferers of chronic sinus problems
Since the 1980s, dozens of studies have discussed the use of saline solutions to irrigate sinus cavities. This alternative treatment has been used across many cultures since ancient times. Controlled clinical studies suggest saline irrigation may play a useful role in the treatment of various nasal conditions, including allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis. While suggesting further study, investigators often conclude that saline nasal irrigation is a safe, drug-free measure for patients who suffer from chronic nasal conditions.
For example, a peer-reviewed study published in Canada in 2003* indicated that clinical evidence is mounting that saline irrigation is effective, simple to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive.
Their study, like others, involved flushing of the nasal cavity with a saline solution. This action was shown to increase mucociliary clearance by moisturizing the nasal passages and removing encrusted material. The study also indicated that treatment guidelines in both the U.S. and Canada should include the use of non-medicated nasal saline irrigation as an adjunct measure for patients with rhinosinusitis, as well as for postoperative cleansing of the nasal cavity.
Today, consumers have a choice of commercially prepared saline nasal products designed specifically for nasal irrigation. OCEAN Complete® is one that is formulated with a unique salt blend (Ringer's solution) solution, reported in medical journals to be more effective than saline alone. 1-5 The sterile solution requires no mixing and comes with two applicator tips - orange for irrigating and white for moisturizing.
*Papsin, B, MD, and McTavish, A, MSC: Saline nasal irrigation: Its role as an adjunct treatment, Canadian Family Physician, volume 49: February 2003. (Study did not evaluate OCEAN® Saline Nasal Spray products.)
1. Unal M, et al. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115(10):796-7. 2. Boek WM, et al. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(3):396-9. 3. Unal M, et al. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116(7):536-8. 4. Adam P, et al. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(1):39-43. 5. Baranuik JN, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(2):655-62.
W089